Saturday, November 07, 2009

No election law in Iraq (still)

The Iraqi Parliament has still not passed an election law. They met again today, this was supposed to be the day, like so many before it, it wasn't. CNN reports that now 'the word' is that Parliament will pass something on Sunday and cite MP Bari "Al-Zebari said several Sunni Arab parliament members boycotted the Saturday session and doubts there will be a Sunday vote. [Mahmoud] Othman told CNN that lawmakers couldn't reach an accord over the issue of Kirkuk and said some Sunni Arab and Turkmen members left the session." AFP adds, "The vote is planned for January 16 but the date has been thrown into doubt because of wrangles over the electoral system to be used in what will be the second national poll since the ouster of dictator Saddam Hussein in 2003."

So now, mark your playing cards, they're saying Sunday the law will pass.

While the stalemate continues, so does the violence.

Bombings?


Laith Hammoudi (McClatchy Newspapers) reports a rocket attack on the Green Zone. Reuters notes a Baghdad bicycle boming which claimed the life of 1 Sahwa leader and left three people wounded.

Shootings?

Laith Hammoudi (McClatchy Newspapers) reports 1 police officer shot dead in Mosul. Reuters drops back to Friday to note 1 police officer shot dead in Kirkuk.

In today's New York Times, John Leland offers "Adversities Await Iraqis Who Return Home" which covers the IOM report (see Tuesday's snapshot for more on the IOM report) and I wanted to say something nice about the article because (a) the IOM report (and other organizations' reports) need to get press coverage and (b) I've got a bad headache and am really not in the mood for a lengthy critique. But I made the mistake of reading Leland.

Question: Did Leland read IOM's report?

There report is specifically on, PAY ATTENTION, LELAND, Iraqis who were displaced internally. This is not about Iraqi refugees who left the country. But Leland's a damn liar and a damn whore (unless he's just too stupid to read). His first paragraph was already questionable as it appeared he was attempting to include external refugees in his 'report' on a report which does not address them. But maybe I was wrong? Maybe the vague words were just a lazy reporter slapping s**t together?

Then comes paragraph three where suddenly he's yet again trying to include everyone when the report only studies internal refugees. Is he so damn stupid he doesn't know the difference?

The internal refugees are those Iraqis who remained in Iraq but were driven from their homes. The external refugees are those Iraqis who were driven from their homes and left the country. It's not that hard to grasp unless you're intentionally attempting to mislead.

He not only distorts the report, he questions it. And that's him, not an expert, not "___ at ___ states ____."

It's a piece of garbage, this is a really s**ty report from a sh**ty paper that really has so damn little to offer that they've now taken to distorting an IOM report.

It's that shameful, it's that embarrassing.

I am not a reporter, I made the decision not to go into that field long, long ago. So it should be really embarrassing for John Leland that my half-ass work here trumps his lousy reporting that the New York Times felt was worth running. And repeating, we covered it on TUESDAY! On Tuesday. Four days later, the paper gets around to it and they can't even get the facts of the IOM's report straight. Even on the minor issues -- like how to round numbers -- Leland can't get it right.

Here's Leland:

The returning families who spoke to researchers came from a variety of ethnic and religious groups: 50 percent were Shiite, 41 percent Sunni and 9 percent Christian.

Here's reality (from Tuesday's snapshot):

Of those returning to their former homes across Iraq, Arab Shia Muslims make up the largest percent (49.4%), followed by Arab Sunni Muslim (31.0%), Turkmen Sunni Muslim (9.7%) and Christians (8.9%).

Turkmen are their own category. And Leland can't do math. He combines 9.7% and 31.0% to get 41%. That's fine that's 40.7% and you can round it up to 41% (you really shouldn't lump Turkmen and non-Turkmen into one category, however). But look what he does with Shia. The report states they are 49.4% Anything lower than .5% is not raised. So they are not 50% despite what he says. Where did he go to school? Did no one bother to teach him math?

We frequently note things that are sent in to the public account and I'm happy to do so when we can. But to be clear, we have no interest in Jim Hightower. I could go into that in depth but I'll be kind and just say: "No interest." Actually, I'll add that when CSPAN decides to go for ratings and starts doing VH1 type programs like Behind the Politics, the Hightower special will more than make clear why we say "No interest."

We'll note the latest posts at community websites (this includes Thursday night, Friday night and, tonight, Wally & Cedric):

""George Bush's lover."
"Garden omlette in the Kitchen"
"E-mails"
"Diana prepares new book, Dems sell out women"
"The Lousy O's"
"Debra Winger"
"Greenpeace, 40 years old"
"the pap smear mike papantonio"
"sunsara taylor"
"Fort Hood shooting"
"Time of death?"
"Democratic Policy Committee"
"Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee"
"Stupid people at wowOwow "
"EDNA (not Garrett)"
"Movies that don't hold up"
"The strong and the brave"
"Why does Dissident Voice foster misogyny?"
"Economy and music"
"IVAW, the elections"
"THIS JUST IN! DEBATING THE CELEB!"
"Cheese"
"THIS JUST IN! HE ACHIEVES SOMETHING! "
"Barry's accomplishments"

The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com.







thomas friedman is a great man

oh boy it never ends

KBR

US Senator Byron Dorgan chaired the Senate Democratic Policy Committee's hearing yesterday on burn pits being used in Afghanistan and Iraq. (The video of the hearing has been posted at the DPC's website.) Joint Base Balad was the primary focus of the hearing but it wasn't the only base addressed. It was learned in the hearing that KBR intentionally ignored regulations, rules and warning and felt, as KBR employee and Iraq War veteran Rick Lamberth explained, "KBR figured that even if they did get caught, they had already made more than enough money to pay any fines and still make a profit." AP reports today that 4 Iraq War veterans filed suit against KBR yesterday.

Among the senators participating in yesterday's hearing was Blanche Lincoln. Ashley Blackstone (KTHV) reports on the hearing and a statement Lincoln issued after:

"As we approach Veterans Day, we are all reminded of the heroic service and sacrifice of our troops who give of themselves to protect the freedom of all Americans. As a grateful nation, we must do all we can to ensure that their health is not at risk as they fulfill their missions abroad. By reducing the prevalence of burn pits and transitioning to other methods of disposal, we can greatly improve the quality of life and health for our troops. Costs associated with these other disposal methods have been a barrier to their implementation. However, though costs may increase in the short-term, the long-term savings could be substantial. As burn pit use is reduced, related medical treatments will decline for the servicemen and women who are exposed to this hazardous smoke," said Lincoln.

We'll note Senator Byron Dorgan's prepared remarks for yesterday's hearing in full:

“Are Burn Pits in Iraq and Afghanistan Making
Our Soldiers Sick?”
Friday, November 6, 2009
628 Dirksen Senate Office Building
This is the twenty-first in a series of oversight hearings conducted by the
Democratic Policy Committee to examine contracting fraud, waste, and
abuse in Iraq and Afghanistan.
A number of the hearings that we have held have focused on the worst kind
of contract abuse: that which unnecessarily puts our troops’ lives in danger.
Today we are going to hear how, as early as 2002, U.S. military installations
in Iraq and Afghanistan began relying on open-air burn pits, disposing of
waste materials in a very dangerous manner.
We will hear how there were dire health warnings from Air Force officials
about the dangers of burn pit smoke. We will hear how there were
Department of Defense regulations in place that said that burn pits should
only be used in short-term emergency situations – regulations that have now
been codified. And we will hear how, despite all the warnings and all the
regulations, the Army and the contractor in charge of this waste disposal,
Kellogg, Brown, and Root, made frequent and unnecessary use of these burn
pits and exposed thousands of U.S. troops to toxic smoke.
I would like to show
two charts to give you
an idea of the
seriousness of this
issue.
Here is a photograph
showing the smoke
plume from a typical
burn pit being used by
KBR in Iraq:
2
And here is a list of some of the toxins that, according to an Air Force
briefing on the subject, could have been contained in burn pit smoke:
Now, I think it is important to understand that these burn pits were being
used at some very large, populated and well-established bases in Iraq,
six years after we had invaded Iraq.
In fact, burn pits are still used at the Balad Airbase in Iraq, which is the
largest U.S. base in that country. There are 20,000 troops based there,
making it equivalent to a small city. The base has good paved roads, two
large swimming pools with
diving wells, two PX's that
look like huge Americanstyle
supermarkets, five
mess halls, and a fullservice
movie theater
complete with a Dolby
surround sound system.
Here is a picture, for
instance, of one of the
buildings at the base, which
has a Subway sandwich
shop.
My point is that this is not a
makeshift base where one
3
would be surprised to find safe waste disposal with an incinerator. This is
the kind of base were our troops would logically expect that there would be
proper waste disposal.
So today we want to look at this practice of using burn pits, and examine
whether it is endangering our troops’ health. Witnesses will include former
military officials and KBR employees with first-hand experience of this
problem, as well as a medical expert on the health consequences of burn pit
smoke.
Our first witness is Lt. Col. Darrin Curtis, a former Bioenvironmental Flight
Commander for Joint Base Balad from Arkansas, who wrote a 2006 memo
for the Pentagon warning of the acute health hazards associated with the
continued use of burn pits by private contractors. Mr. Curtis has a Ph.D.
in Environmental Engineering and has conducted health risk assessments for
the Air Force for almost 20 years.
Rick Lamberth is a former KBR employee from Maryland who worked on
logistics and helped KBR set up camps from Kuwait into Iraq. He is a longtime
Army reservist who became LOGCAP officer, deployed to Iraq, and
was exposed to burn pits.
Russell Keith served as a Medic for KBR at Balad Air Force Base from
2006 to 2007 and at Basra from 2008 to 2009 and currently resides in
Alabama. Mr. Keith treated many patients in Iraq who had respiratory
problems.
Finally, Anthony Szema is an Assistant Professor of Medicine and Surgery
at Stony Brook University. Dr. Szema is also the Chief of the Allergy
Section at the Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Northport, NY.

If you [PDF format warning] click here, you can see the photos included in Senator Dorgan's statement.

While KBR workers, Iraq War veterans and Iraqis suffer, the children of the greedy rake it in. Sarah Yasmin Rifaat's nose indicates parents without the wherewithal to afford a good nose job but, in fact, she's the thirty-year-old daughter of Julie Hagemeister Rifaat and Maged Ibrahim Rifaat -- Mommy "is a senior corporate counsel at KRB". Well, looking at the photo, you knew Mommy wasn't a cover girl because no one ever taught Sarah how to apply eye make up or, in fact, when too much eye shadow was being used. Then again, maybe she was trick or treating as a street walker when the photo was taken.



The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com.




Friday, November 06, 2009

Iraq snapshot

Friday, November 6, 2009. Chaos and violence continue, Democratic senators hear how KBR's greed put everyone in Iraq at risk, some gas bags shouldn't be on radio, the Fort Hood shooting, and more.
 
 
Rick Lamberth: As a LOGCAP [Logistics Civil Augmentation Program] Operations Manager, it was my duty to report to KBR management when the company was in violation of guidelines and the contract Statement of Work. I witnessed burn pit violations on a weekly basis. When I tried to report violations, I was told by the head of KBR's Health Safety and Environment division to shut up and keep it to myself. At one point, KBR management threatened to sue me for slander if I spoke out about these violations.

Rick Lamberth was in Kuwait, Iraq and Afghanistan.  In addition to being an Iraq War veteran, he worked for KBR and saw "KBR employees dump nuclear, biological, chemical decontamination materials and bio-medical waste, plastics, oil and tires into burn pits" thereby exposing many US and Iraqi citizens to health risks. Rick Lamberth, for example, now has a series of respiratory problems. Last week, Kelly Kennedy (Army Times) reported, "An open-air 'burn pit' at the largest U.S. base in Iraq may have exposed tens of thousands of troops, contractors and Iraqis to cancer-causing dioxins, poisons such as arsenic and carbon monoxide, and hazardous medical waste, documentation gathered by Military Times shows." Kelly was reporting on Joint Base Balad. L. Russel Keith worked for KBR at Joint Base Balad (March 2006 to July 2007) and he explains, "While I was stationed at Balad, I experienced the effects of the massive burn pit that burned 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. The ten-acre pit was located in the northwest corner of the base. An acrid, dark black smoke from the pit would accumulate and hang low over the base for weeks at a time. Every spot on the base was touched by smoke from the pit; everyone who served at the base was exposed to the smoke. It was almost impossible to escape, even in our living units."
 
Rick Lamberth and L. Russell Keith were two of the four witnesses appearing before the Democratic Policy Committee today, for a hearing into burn pits led by Committee Chair Byron Dorgan.  Also appearing as witnesses were Lt Col Darrin Curtis and Dr. Anthony Szema.  At the start of the hearing, Chair Dorgan explained, "This is the twenty-first in a long series of hearings that we have held in the Policy Committee to examine contracting waste and abuse in Iraq and Afghanistan. A number of these hearings have focused on substantial abuse which have put out troops lives in danger.  Some focused just on waste and some on fraud. Today we're going to have a discussion and have a hearing on how, as early as 2002, US military installations in Iraq and Afghanistan began relying on open-air burn pits -- disposing of waste materials in a very dangerous manner. And those burn pits included materials such as hazardous waste, medical waste, virtually all of the waste without segregation of the waste, put in burn pits. We'll hear how there were dire health warnings by Air Force officials about the dangers of burn pit smoke, the toxicity of that smoke, the danger for human health.  We'll hear how the Department of Defense regulations in place said that burn pits should be used only in short-term emergency situations -- regulations that have now been codified. And we will hear how, despite all the warnings and all the regulations, the Army and the contractor in charge of this waste disposal, Kellogg Brown & Root, made frequent and unnecessary use of these burn pits and exposed thousands of US troops to toxic smoke." 
 
That's from Chair Dorgan's opening remarks and you can [PDF format hearing warning] click here to read his prepared remarks (the above is what was stated which differs slightly from the prepared remarks).  You can also visit the Democratic Policy Committee's home page for more information and streaming video of today's hearing should be up there as well. (If it's not up already, it will be up by Monday.)
 
The burn pit issue was dismissed and ignored for many years -- despite the fact that the rules weren't being followed. On October 28, 2009, US House Rep Tim Bishop's office released a statement noting: "Today, President [Barack] Obama singed into law the National Defense Authorization Act 9H.R. 2647), which includes important provisions authored by Congressman Tim Bishop (NY-1) to protect the thousands of troops exposed to toxic, open burn pits used in Iraq and Afghanistan. These provisions were based on Bishop's legislation, the Military Personnel War Zone Toxic Exposure Prevention Act, (HR 2419) introduced with Rep. Carol Shea-Porter on May 14, 2009." Hopefully, that signing will result in the press paying a bit more attention to the issue and not, as some have done, treat it as a dispute between political parties -- which is how it was too often treated by the press during the Bush years, with a lot of hedging and a lot of 'some say' type 'reporting.' December 20, 2006, Lt Col Darrin Curtis wrote a memo entitled "Burn Pit Health Hazards" [PDF format warning, click here].
 
Chair Byron Dorgan: Mr. Curtis, why did you decide to write the 2006 memorandum? And did anyone else at that point share your concerns about the health impact of burn pits?
 
Lt Col Darrin Curtis: Yes, Senator, they did. The Chief of Air Space Medicine had the same concerns I did. The memo was initially written so that we could expedite the installation of the incinerators.  From my understanding, there were spending limits of monies with health issues and not health issues so I wanted to write the report to show that there are health issues associated with burn pits so that we could hopefully accelerate the installation of the incinerators.
 
Chair Byron Dorgan: Of the type of burn pit you saw in Iraq in 2006 -- that's some while after the war began and infrastructure had been created and so on except without incinerators -- if something of that nature were occurring in a neighborhood here in Washington DC or any American city, what are the consequences to them?
 
Lt Col Darrin Curtis: At least fines and possibly jail.

Chair Byron Dorgan: Because?
 
Lt Col Darrin Curtis: Of the regulations that are out there today.
 
Chair Byron Dorgan: Because it's a serious risk to human health?
 
Lt Col Darrin Curtis: Yes, sir.
 
Chair Byron Dorgan: You say that when you arrived in Iraq an inspector for the US Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine -- which is CHPPM -- told you that the Balad burn pit was the worst environmental site that he has seen and that included the ten years he had performed environmental clean up for the Army and Defense's Logistic Agency.  And yet in your testimony, you also say that CHPPM has done this study and says adverse health risks are unlikely. So you're talking about an inspector from CHPPM that says 'this is the worst I've seen' and then a report comes out later from CHPPM that says: "Adverse health risks are unlikely. Long-term health effects are not expected to occur from breathing the smoke." Contradiction there and why?
 
Lt Col Darrin Curtis: I think any organization, you're going to have people with differences of opinion. But at CHPPM, I'm sure that was the same-same outcome there. Cause I don't know if that individual --
 
Chair Byron Dorgan: (Overlapping) Do you think that CHPPM -- do you think CHPPM assessment that's been relied on now is just wrong?
 
Lt Col Darrin Curtis: (Overlapping) I think -- I think -- Senator, I think the hard line that there is no health effects is a -- is a very strong comment that we don't have the data to say. Do we have the data to say that it is a health risk?  I don't think we have that either. But I do not think we have the data to say there is no health risk.

Chair Byron Dorgan: You are a bio-environmental engineer what is -- what is your own opinion? Without testing or data, you saw the burn pits, you were there, you hear the testimony of what went in the burn pits, you hear Dr. Szema's assessment.  What's your assessment?
 
Lt Col Darrin Curtis: I think we're going to look at a lot of sick people later on.
 
"I think we're going to look at a lot of sick people later on."  And why, the bigger why?  Why would anyone -- KBR or anyone -- put people at risk? Rick Lamberth explained during the hearing, "KBR was able to get away with this because the Army never enforced the applicable standards. KBR's Project Controls Department also kept their information hidden. During one visit by a representative from DCMA. I heard someone from Project Controls state that it was her job to keep DCMA away from the books during the inspection. KBR management would brag that they could get away with doing anything they wanted because the army could not function without them. KBR figured that even if they did get caught, they had already made more than enough money to pay any fines and still make a profit."
 
"Brag that they could get away with doing anything."  "Even if they did get caught, they had already made more than enough money to pay any fines and still make a profit." Chair Dorgan noted that one of his greatest disappointments is that there is not "a Truman type committee with subpoena powers" currently "perhaps some day we'll get that." Senator Tom Udall agreed with Dorgan that a Truman type committee was needed.  Rick Lamberth told Senator Udall that he did an analysis about how the burn pits could be shifted down wind. 
 
Senator Tom Udall: They didn't want to do that?
 
Rick Lamberth: Correct, sir.
 
Senator Tom Udall: Cost them too much?
 
Rick Lamberth: Correct, sir.
 
 
Senator Jon Tester spoke of how Lamberth was told by KBR to keep quiet about violations "because that clean up was future business."  He wondered, "How many burn pits there were in Iraq?" L. Russell Keith stated Balad was the biggest one (and the one he was familiar with), that it was ten acres, that "a lot of parts of it were below ground [. . .] there were a lot of things in it that wouldn't burn [. . .] old vehicles [. . .] transit buses". Senator Blanche Lincoln noted that the burn pits continue in Iraq and Afghanistan and we'll include this exchange.
 
Senator Blanche Lincoln: The comment made about the fact that these [burn pits] were used because there's potential future business, is it the typical business of KBR and others for hazardous waste clean up?
 
Rick Lamberth: What do you mean, ma'am, by the -- ?
 
Senator Blanche Lincoln: I mean if there's potential business -- what you're creating? It sounds like what we're creating, to what many of us have lived through up here, which are Super Fund sites and hazardous waste clean up. Is that a business that the current contractors actually have or can facilitate?
 
Rick Lamberth: Yes, ma'am. They have -- it's currently a contract line item number in the master statement of work. And what they'll do, they don't have the expertise in how, so they'll turn around and they'll contract it out. When I left July 2009, I left Baghdad, they had subcontracted that out to [**]. Yet when you talk to them, they act like they're resolved of all responsibility. And I tell them: "Negative, you are still responsible, you being the prime contractor, you're still responsible for compliance of EPA and DOD regulations and Defense Logistic Agencies regulations which is really in charge of DoD's Hazmat Defense Logistic Agency and they would want to deny that. They say 'No, [**] is doing that now.' I say 'No, you're still, you being the prime, you're still responsible.'
 
Senator Blanche Lincoln:  Well of course that's a whole different issue I suppose in terms of spending our US tax payer dollars to clean up things that the same contractor actually created.
 
First, "[**]"? Epilogue or Echologue was what Lamberth was saying.  I have no idea on subcontractors or whether the subcontractor would get 'fancy' with the name and spell it a different way.  So we're just noting it as "[**]" Second, Lincoln went on to note that even more important than the dollars being wasted are the people who've been harmed by exposure. BURN PITS  Action Center is a resource and a clearing house of information.  Among those sharing their experiences is "Debby:"
 
 
I arrived at Joint Base Balad, formerly known as Camp Anaconda in March 2008, and needless to say we all have the same issues as to what we smelled and what we saw.  I have been home 11 months now and I want to make a statement about this issue.                           
First off keep a good record of how your feeling.  You may not notice anything at first.  I started getting shortness of breath and just thought that it was the humidity in our air here in Indiana.  I got a respiratory infection once I was home that turned into bronchitis.  It took me OVER a month to clear that up.  I had a cough from day one from leaving Iraq, and could not understand this or why I was doing this?  Blamed it on the weather.  My cough got so bad I contacted the VA and said this is not normal and I want to have my lungs tested...pulmonary function test was ordered...I failed it and found out I have COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease).  I now use an inhaler and my breathing is worse at night, because I wheeze now.  I came home at the end of November by March I had another issue, my colon.  I was 47 at the time and had to do a colonoscopy 3 years earlier than I should have.  Found out I had polyps and a tear in my colon.  It is now November and I cannot seem to understand why I have still a colon issue.  Now my esophagus is a problem.  I had another cold back a few months ago and lost my voice for 3 full weeks. I had bronchitis again.  Could not shake it.  I am scheduled for another colon scope since I have this issue and also to have my throat checked out.  My esophagus is closing up and I may have to have it stretched back out.  NO ONE in my family has ever had an issue like this.  I blame this on the effects of the burn pit.  My memory and forgetfulness is a REAL problem for me.  I can't seem to remember anything.  So I guess anyone's secrets are safe with me I would forget easily after a few days.  I have other issues I just wanted to list a few.                    
Take photos of the burn pits for your own personal records they would prove very helpful later on.  Keep researching all that you can on this issue, there are long lists of what soldiers are reporting that is wrong with them.  I have to write mine down or I will forget.  Not that a person can but my memory won't allow me anymore to recall things like I once did.                            
Life if going to be challenging and many of us may not live a full life due to our new found health issue.  But from one soldier to all you others we fought a good battle and we should keep each other in our prayers.  God Bless you all and keep up the good fight and take care of your health.
            
 
 
Back to the hearing, Dr. Szema compared what is being seen to the conditions of fire fighters who were at Ground Zero following 9-11.  He noted that he sees young people whom he shouldn't be seeing including ones with asthma -- when asthma would prevent them from being inducted into the military and that even if a few managed to skirt by in the screening process, the rates of asthma shouldn't be as high as it is.  We'll note this exchange from early in the hearing.
 
Chair Byron Dorgan: Dr. Szema, what's your assessment of what you've heard? You've not been in Iraq, you've not seen the burn pits, you've heard them described, you heard Mr. Lambert and Mr. Keith describe what was thrown into the burn pits.  What's your assessment of what we might see as a result of this? Is this a potentially serious threat to human health of those who were exposed?
 
Dr. Szema: Originally, I didn't even know what a burn pit was. So we thought that the higher asthma rates that we were seeing anecdotally were related to the shamal, the dust storms in Iraq, and possibly exposure to inhalational particles of improvised explosive devices. And then we wrote -- we did our study indicating that the rates of asthma were twice that if you were an Iraq deployed versus stateside deployed. And only recently when I learned about the burn pits, I knew that that could potentially, plausibly be one of the explanations. We-we actually did have PM 2.5 data from CHPPM in one of our presentations at the American Thoracic Society Conference and the PM 2.5 levels were in the thousands. Just for an example, in comparison, the Environmental Protection Agency standards in the United States is 35 micrograms per cubic meter. If you're over 35 in the United States, that's air pollution and they were measuring it in the thousands and that's irrespective of what's actually the concentration so, in and of itself, there were clearly particles in the air. That was not included in the 2008 report, that was part of our poster presentation.  So my concern is -- what -- you're not supposed to be burning anything. Even if you're burning wood in cooking, we know that in third world countries if we reduce the use of cook stoves and fires, we can reduce respiratory mortality by millions of people worldwide.  And, in fact, the American Thoracic Society is coming out with a position statement that even in the United States, if we roll back the EPA pollution standards a little bit, we will save millions of lives in the United States from air pollution. So clearly, I think, when you have uncontrolled burns, there will be a litany of health effects  
 
 
One more time, Rick Lamberth's statements on how greed was able to trump humanity, "KBR was able to get away with this because the Army never enforced the applicable standards. KBR's Project Controls Department also kept their information hidden. During one visit by a representative from DCMA. I heard someone from Project Controls state that it was her job to keep DCMA away from the books during the inspection. KBR Management would brag that they could get away with doing anything they wanted because the army could not function without them. KBR figured that even if they did get caught, they had already made more than enough money to pay any fines and still make a profit."
 
Iraq was addressed on NPR's The Diane Rehm Show  today during the second hour.  Diane's guest host Katty Kay was joined by James Kitfield (National Journal), Paul Richter (Los Angeles Times) and Farah Stockman (Boston Globe).
 
Katty Kay: On the one hand we had the Iraqi Parliament which failed again this week to approve a law regulating its January election. Uh, Paul, do you think this election is going to take place?
 
Paul Richter:  It sounds like it could be delayed but I notice some Iraqi legislators who are telling the press 'Well maybe it will only be delayed slightly. On the other hand, they've been debating this election law for some time and it has serious consequences for the US if they don't get this settled because, of course, the White House and the Pentagon are thinking about drawing-down those troops further. We need more in Afghanistan probably.
 
Katty Kay: And at the same time, we have Iraq signing deals to develop its oil fields. There was news this morning in the Washington Post [Ernesto Londono and Qais Mizher's "Exxon-Shell Consortium signs deal to develop Iraqi oil field"] that Exxon and Shell are going to sign a deal with the Iraqi Oil Ministry as well. So sort of some good news on the economic front, perahps James?
 
James Kitfield: Some good news but you know the prob -- and why we're so in getting these elections behind Iraq -- is so they can then get back to the major issue of reconcilation that are outstanding and one is an oil law.  You know, the K- you know, the Kurds are already signing deals, you know, independently of the central government. That's a potential fault line for divisions in Iraq.
 
Katty Kay: And, of course, the hitch behind signing the current election law is over --
 
James Kitfield: Kirkuk.
 
Katty Kay: Kirkuk which is a big oil --
 
James Kitfield: Right! There is concern among -- ever since Saddam has been ousted -- he had flooded Arabs into Kirkuk area. Since he's been ousted, a lot of the Kurds have been pushing more people into Kirkuk.  There's concerns in that tension between the Arabs and the Kurds that the election will sort of uh give one side an advantage over the other and so that's been the sticking point. But I'll take Paul's point a little further, I suspect there's going to be a surge of some tens of thousands of troops to Afghanistan even though Obama hasn't announced that yet. I [su]spect he will. For that to happen, it really -- we have a very aggressive withdrawal from Iraq [. . .]
 
Okay, point. James Kitfield? Doesn't belong on radio.  Potential?  "POOOOOO -- tential!"  As he stumbles and fumbles his damn words.  It's difficult to listen to him.  Forget what he's offering (which isn't informed), he can't speak a complete sentence without changing in the middle of it -- usually several times.  Do they not get how hard on the ears this is?  It's not just the uh-uh (and he does it far more than I note), that's fine.  Stumble.  Gather your thoughts.  But speak the English language.  Deciding mid-word that you want a different one?  Over and over?  I remember oral exams in grad school where highly nervous people came off more assured than Kitfield.  It isn't pleasant to listen to and it doesn't make for good radio.
 
Now that's (A).  (B)?  Know your damn facts.  He maintains (we're not including that section) there are 115,000 troops in Iraq currently.  What?  128,000 was August 31st and that's the GAO's estimate that they provided on Monday.  Unless someone's done a head count since then, an organization or an individual, that's your number.  A friend in the brass in Iraq says the number is "about 123,000" right now.  About.  The problem with not going with the known is that an "about" X suddenly gets lowered by a James Kitfield.  He pimped 115,000 US troops in Iraq. Pimped it today.  On NPR and was not corrected. A gas bag with a lot of opinions and few facts is always a problem.
 
Katty Kay: Give us a quick update, Farah, on the security situation in Baghdad following, of course, last week's truck bombing. Have you heard anything on how security's been changed or boosted? Have they reinstated some of the barriers, for example, in the streets in the Green Zone?
 
Farah Stockman: I just think that we're hearing a lot of reports about bombings and it's not looking good and it's not looking good -- it's not looking good. But I think James might have a better on that than I do.
 
Oh, Farah.  How you failed the listeners.  Instead they got to hear James stumble around yet again and, in the process, pronounce "domestic" three different ways.  That's what happens when you don't committ to a word until your half-way done speaking it.  Get him off the radio.  There's no excuse for this.  People have been far too nice to him for far too long.  It's not that he's an idiot -- he is one -- it's that he sounds like an idiot on the radio.  If it's too difficult for him to speak, don't bring him on the radio.  And grasp that as difficult as it is for him to figure out which words to randomnly string together, it's that much harder for the audience to have to listen to him.  There's no excuse for that.
 
 
 
Bombings?
 
Sahar Issa (McClatchy Newspapers) reports a Mosul roadside bombing which claimed the life of 1 police officer and a second one which left five people wounded.
 
Shootings?
 
Sahar Issa (McClatchy Newspapers) reports 1 Sahwa ("Awakening" or "Sons Of Iraq") shot dead last night in Kirkuk. Wang Guanqun (Xinua) reports an attack on a barber shop in al-Sa'adiya in which 1 barber was shot dead and another person was wounded.
 
Corpses?
 
Sahar Issa (McClatchy Newspapers) reports 1 corpse (Peshmerga officer) discovered in Kirkuk last night.
 
 
Turning to the US, Frances and Jack Barrios were last noted in the October 30th snapshot. Efforts have been taking place to deport Frances Barrios, the wife of Iraq War veteran Jack Barrios and the mother of their two children. Her 'crime'? Coming to the United States at six-years-old. Teresa Watanabe (Los Angeles Times) reports that yesterday the couple learned she was granted "humanitarian parole" and will be able to apply for a green card and remain in the country. Tony Valdez (Los Angeles' Fox 11 -- link has text and video) was present when Frances Barrios received the news:

Tony Valdez: Frances Barrios looked mystified and anxious about her attorneys visit to her Van Nuys apartment in the evening. She usually went to Jessica Dominguez' office whenever there was a development in her bid to stay in the US with her husband and her children. What the attorney told her husband, an Iraq War veteran, was completely unexpected.

Jessica Dominguez: The Citizenship and Immigration Services has granted your wife parole which means you can now give her legal permanent resident status without her having to go back to Guatemala.
 
 
Yesterday in Texas, there was an attack on Fort Hood.  Mary Pat Flaherty, William Wan and Christian Davenport (Washington Post) report that the suspect is US Army Maj Nidal M. Hasan, a 39-year-old psychiatrist whose aunt said he had endured mocking and verbal abuse over the years for being a Muslim and she states that he attempted to get out of the military. Peter Slevin (Washington Post) reported 12 people were killed at the base with thrity-one more left injured. The death toll has risen to at least 13. Julian E. Barnes, Josh Meyer and Kat Linthicum (Los Angeles Times) explain, "Ft. Hood, which sprawls across 339 square miles of central Texas hill country, is the world's largest military installation. It supports two full armored divisions -- the 1st Cavalry Division and the 4th Infantry Division -- and is home to more than 70,000 soldiers, civilian workers and family members. It is the largest single employer in Texas." Ann Scott Tyson (Washington Post) notes, "This year, 117 active-duty Army soldiers were reported to have committed suicide, with 81 of those cases confirmed -- up from 103 suicides during the same period last year. Ten suicides have been reported at Fort Hood this year; more than 75 of its personnel have committed suicide since 2003. Fort Hood's high number of suicides is also linked to the fact that it is the Army's largest base, with more than 53,000 soldiers." Dahr Jamail adds:

Fort Hood, located in central Texas, is the largest US military base in the world and contains up to 50,000 soldiers. It is one of the most heavily deployed bases to both Iraq and Afghanistan. In fact, the shooter himself was facing an impending deployment to Iraq.
The soldier says that the mood on the base is "very grim," and that even before this incident, troop morale has been very low.
"I'd say it's at an all-time low - mostly because of Afghanistan now," he explained. "Nobody knows why we are at either place, and I believe the troops need to know why they are there, or we should pull out, and this is a unanimous feeling, even for folks who are pro-war."
In a strikingly similar incident on May 11, 2009, a US soldier gunned down five fellow soldiers at a stress-counseling center at a US base in Baghdad. Adm. Mike Mullen, the chairman of the US military's Joint Chiefs of Staff, told reporters at a news conference at the Pentagon that the shootings occurred in a place where "individuals were seeking help."
"It does speak to me, though, about the need for us to redouble our efforts, the concern in terms of dealing with the stress," Admiral Mullen said. "It also speaks to the issue of multiple deployments."
Commenting on that incident in nearly parallel terms, US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates said that the Pentagon needs to redouble its efforts to relieve stress caused by repeated deployments in war zones; stress that is further exacerbated by limited time at home in between deployments.

Nancy A. Youssef (McClatchy Newspapers) informs the suspect was supposed to deploy to Afghanistan.  Kelly Gooch (Tyler Morning Telegraph) reports on some families reactions as they attempted to find out the status on their loved ones at Fort Hood:


Spc. Shawntae Hall, 22, is one of the soldiers stationed at the Army base.
Her mother, Norma Tompkins, of Tyler, said she called Ms. Hall Thursday and left a message on her cell phone. She also tried all of her daughter's friends and a fellow military mother.             
"I kind of lost it for a few minutes. When I heard from her it was the biggest relief of my life," she said.         
During the short phone conversation, Mrs. Tompkins said Ms. Hall told her officials were about to lock down the base and she would not be able to use a cell phone or the Internet.     

Ann Davies (The Age) notes): that a female police officer "arrived and shot Hasan several times before he went down. She was wounded in the process." That was Sgt Kimberly Munley.  Matthew Schofield (Kansas City Star) reports, "Muley also took three bullets, one in each thigh and one in a wrist. By all accounts, she was swift, decisive, and probably saved lives. It was a lucky thing she happened to be nearby when the emergency call came in. She found Hasan four minutes after the first 911 call."  In addition, on NBC's Today Show this morning, Matt Lauer spoke with Lt Gen Robert Cone who praised Amber Bahr who assisted other soldiers including carrying one, Grant Moxon, away from the crime scene despite the fact that she herself had been shot: "I think most notable about her is the fact that despite the fact she was shot, she assisted in helping other soldiers, put a tourniquet on a solider, carried him out to medical care -- and only after she had taken care of others did she realize that she herself had been shot."   Moni Basu (CNN -- link has text and several videos as well) offers, "Soldiers were dragging bodies away from the shooter. They snatched tablecloths off tables, cut up their own sage-green digital combat uniforms, even their tan undershirts, and turned them into tourniquets and pressure bandages. Everyone tried to render CPR and medical aid. Some were medical personnel. Others were simply friends helping friends."  Among the 13 who lost their lives is Francheska Velez.  Peter Slevin (Washington Post) reports the 21-year-old Iraq War veteran was set to begin maternity leave.  Her cousin Jennifer Arzuaga tells CBS' Derrick Blakley, "She was a very wonderful person, very brave, very kind hearted. She didn't deserve to lose her life. She had a lot to live for."  CBS reports Michael Pearson, who was set to deploy to Iraq, died while in surgery after being shot three times and quotes his mother Sheryll Pearson stating, "He was the best son in the whole world; good student, good friend, loyal, hardworker. He was my best friend. I was just shocked because I was getting ready for him, I was preparing for him to come home for Christmas and I knew he would probably be deployed in January and this was just amazing to me, it just doesn't seem real to me."

 Mark Memmott (NPR) reports on this morning's press briefing at Fort Hood:

7:37 a.m. ET: The suspect's condition is "stable." Why was it originally said by Army personnel that suspect Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan was dead? "Confusion," says the briefer, Col. John Rossi.

7:39 a.m. ET: One civilian was killed. The other fatally wounded victims were military personnel, Col. John Rossi says.

7:40 a.m. ET: The soldiers at the scene were not armed. The "first responder" who wounded the suspect was a female police officer. She was wounded and is now in stable condition.
 
TV notes, NOW on PBS begins airing on most PBS stations tonight (check local listings) and their focus this week is:

Only one year after a historic election rerouted the course of America's political culture, do the 2009 election results show momentum swinging in the opposite direction?
This week, NOW's David Brancaccio talks to political author and columnist David Sirota about populist anger, the Obama administration's successes and failures, and how this week's election results foreshadow the state of politics in 2010.


Also airing tonight on many PBS stations, Bill Moyers Journal offers a veterans day special. Washington Week finds Gwen sitting around the table with James Barnes (National Journal), Ceci Connolly (Washington Post), John Harris (Politico) and Martha Raddatz (ABC News). Meanwhile Bonnie Erbe will sit down with Sam Bennett, Karen Czarnecki, Cari Dominguez and Avis Jones-DeWeever to discuss the week's events on PBS' To The Contrary. Check local listings, on many stations, it begins airing tonight. And turning to broadcast TV, Sunday CBS' 60 Minutes offers:

Cyber War
Could foreign hackers get into the computer systems that run crucial elements of the world's infrastructure, such as the power grids, water works or even a nation's military arsenal, to create havoc? They already have. Steve Kroft reports.


Andre Agassi
Katie Couric interviews the tennis champion about his drug use, the depression that made him use methamphetamine and other aspects of his personal life and tennis career in his first interview about his upcoming book. (This is a double-length segment).


60 Minutes, this Sunday, Nov. 8, at 7 p.m. ET/PT.



 

IHEC head says 'postpone elections'

The Iraqi Parliament failed again on Thursday to approve a law to regulate a national election in January, deepening doubts about whether the nation can hold the vote on schedule.

The above is from Timothy Williams and Sa'ad Izzi's "Iraqis Again Fail to Approve Election Law" (New York Times). This morning, the latest development is reported by Muhanad Mohammed (Reuters) who reveals the head of the Independent High Electoral Commission, Faraj al-Haideri, is calling for a delay in the intended January elections. This echoes statements he has already made. From yesterday's snapshot:

Sammy Ketz (AFP) quotes election commission head Faraj al-Haidari stating, "We can no longer organise elections on January 16 -- that would have been difficult even if we had received the law today. Whether they retain the old electoral law, amend it or adopt an entirely new one is a matter for members of parliament but we are the ones who will have to implement their decisions according to the timetable. We hope that MPs will resolve their dilemma but we are not going to sacrifice international norms and criteria -- we're obliged to respect the rules so that these elections are transparent."

Efforts have been taking place to deport Frances Barrios, the wife of Iraq War veteran Jack Barrios and the mother of their two children. Her 'crime'? Coming to the United States at six-years-old. Teresa Watanabe (Los Angeles Times) reports that yesterday the couple learned she was granted "humanitarian parole" and will be able to apply for a green card and remain in the country. Tony Valdez (Los Angeles' Fox 11 -- link has text and video) was present when Frances Barrios received the news:

Tony Valdez: Frances Barrios looked mystified and anxious about her attorneys visit to her Van Nuys apartment in the evening. She usually went to Jessica Dominguez' office whenever there was a development in her bid to stay in the US with her husband and her children. What the attorney told her husband, an Iraq War veteran, was completely unexpected.

Jessica Dominguez: The Citizenship and Immigration Services has granted your wife parole which means you can now give her legal permanent resident status without her having to go back to Guatemala.

The Barrios were last noted in the October 30th snapshot.

Wednesday the US military announced 2 deaths in Iraq. DoD has yet to identify either of the fallen. Presumably one of the two has been identified by her father (if not, then there's a death that wasn't announced by M-NF). Dennis Yusko (Albany Times Union) reports that Staff Sgt Amy Seyboth Tirador died on Wednesday while serving in Iraq according to Gerard Seyboth, her father and that she was on her second deployment to Iraq. He is quoted stating, "I'm very proud of my daughter." Her survivors also include husband Mickey who is on his third tour of duty in Iraq. Yusko notes, "More than 206,000 U.S. women have served in the Middle East since 2003, most of them in Iraq. About 106 servicewoman have died and more than 600 injured in Iraq, according to casualty lists." Paul Merril (Fox 23) reports that Mickey Tirador "is accompanying his wife's remains back from Iraq."

TV notes, NOW on PBS begins airing on most PBS stations tonight (check local listings) and their focus this week is:

Only one year after a historic election rerouted the course of America's political culture, do the 2009 election results show momentum swinging in the opposite direction?
This week, NOW's David Brancaccio talks to political author and columnist David Sirota about populist anger, the Obama administration's successes and failures, and how this week's election results foreshadow the state of politics in 2010.


Also airing tonight on many PBS stations, Bill Moyers Journal offers a veterans day special. Washington Week finds Gwen sitting around the table with James Barnes (National Journal), Ceci Connolly (Washington Post), John Harris (Politico) and Martha Raddatz (ABC News). Meanwhile Bonnie Erbe will sit down with Sam Bennett, Karen Czarnecki, Cari Dominguez and Avis Jones-DeWeever to discuss the week's events on PBS' To The Contrary. Check local listings, on many stations, it begins airing tonight. And turning to broadcast TV, Sunday CBS' 60 Minutes offers:

Cyber War
Could foreign hackers get into the computer systems that run crucial elements of the world's infrastructure, such as the power grids, water works or even a nation's military arsenal, to create havoc? They already have. Steve Kroft reports.


Andre Agassi
Katie Couric interviews the tennis champion about his drug use, the depression that made him use methamphetamine and other aspects of his personal life and tennis career in his first interview about his upcoming book. (This is a double-length segment).


60 Minutes, this Sunday, Nov. 8, at 7 p.m. ET/PT.



Turning to public radio, this morning Katty Kay fills in as guest host on NPR's The Diane Rehm Show which begins broadcasting live on most NPR stations at 10:00 AM EST (and streaming live online at the same time). The panel for the first hour (domestic) is Jackie Calmes (New York Times), Lynn Sweet (Chicago Sun-Times) and Glenn Thrush (Politico). The panel for the second hour (international) James Kitfield (National Journal), Paul Richter (Los Angeles Times) and Farah Stockman (Boston Globe).

If you caught something this morning and were thinking, "What morons!" -- Ava and I caught it as well. Yes, they are morons. We plan to grab it at Third and we are aware that Mr.-I-Care so does not that he wasn't even aware of the 'suicide by cop' which took place Sunday. The whole thing was pretty much an embarrassment and incredibly sloppy which goes to how little they care about the issue of Iraq. We will be addressing it on Sunday.

This is much more brief than I hoped but we're rushing to make a hearing this morning. So that's going to be it. The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com.








60 minutes
cbs news
pbs
to the contrary
bonnie erbe
npr
the diane rehm show

The Fort Hood shooting

An army officer upset at the prospect of deploying to Iraq opened fire on fellow soldiers at the world's largest military base yesterday in a mass shooting that left 12 people dead and at least 31 wounded.
At least two other men in uniform were initially suspected of involvement in the incident at Fort Hood in Texas, raising fears of a co-ordinated attack.
However base commander Lieutenant General Bob Cone later confirmed there was only one suspected gunman, identified last night as Major Nidal Malik Hasan, a doctor specialising in mental health.

The above is from Giles Whittell's "'Iraq deployment triggered Nidal Malik Hasan US base rampage'" (Times of London) and a briefing this morning puts the dead at 13 and the injured at 28. The suspect is US Army Maj Nidal Malik Hasan. Julian E. Barnes and Andrew Zajac (Los Angeles Times) add that he was scheduled to deploy to Iraq November 28th. From Kelly Gooch's "East Texas Military Families React To Events At Fort Hood" (Tyler Morning Telegraph):


Spc. Shawntae Hall, 22, is one of the soldiers stationed at the Army base.
Her mother, Norma Tompkins, of Tyler, said she called Ms. Hall Thursday and left a message on her cell phone. She also tried all of her daughter's friends and a fellow military mother.
"I kind of lost it for a few minutes. When I heard from her it was the biggest relief of my life," she said.
During the short phone conversation, Mrs. Tompkins said Ms. Hall told her officials were about to lock down the base and she would not be able to use a cell phone or the Internet.

For those wondering how blocking cell phone and internet use is about protecting service members, it's not. It's about the military brass attempting to clamp down on the story -- not at all different from what thug Nouri al-Maliki does in Iraq with the press. Skip notes this from Ann Davies (The Age):

It is not clear how long the killing spree lasted but a female first-responder, a policewoman on the base, arrived and shot Hasan several times before he went down. She was wounded in the process.
For many hours the assumption was that Hasan had died. But when the lockdown was lifted, base commander Lieutenant-General Robert Cone stunned the media by saying Hasan was alive and in a stable condition, though not yet talking.

Moni Basu (CNN -- link has text and several videos as well) offers, "Soldiers were dragging bodies away from the shooter. They snatched tablecloths off tables, cut up their own sage-green digital combat uniforms, even their tan undershirts, and turned them into tourniquets and pressure bandages. Everyone tried to render CPR and medical aid. Some were medical personnel. Others were simply friends helping friends."

As noted earlier, there was a press briefing this morning at Fort Hood. Mark Memmott (NPR) reports on that:

7:37 a.m. ET: The suspect's condition is "stable." Why was it originally said by Army personnel that suspect Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan was dead? "Confusion," says the briefer, Col. John Rossi.

7:39 a.m. ET: One civilian was killed. The other fatally wounded victims were military personnel, Col. John Rossi says.

7:40 a.m. ET: The soldiers at the scene were not armed. The "first responder" who wounded the suspect was a female police officer. She was wounded and is now in stable condition.

The following community sites updated last night:
And Marcia's "EDNA (not Garrett)," Trina's "E-mails," Ruth's "Time of death?," Ann's "Greenpeace, 40 years old," Kat's "Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee" and Isaiah's "George Bush's lover."


The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com.
















thomas friedman is a great man






oh boy it never ends

Thursday, November 05, 2009

I Hate The War

Untitled Document
http://ent.groundspring.org/EmailNow/pub.php?module=URLTracker&cmd=track&j=297764009&u=3308519 http://ent.groundspring.org/EmailNow/pub.php?module=URLTracker&cmd=track&j=297764009&u=3308520


http://ent.groundspring.org/EmailNow/pub.php?module=URLTracker&cmd=track&j=297764009&u=3308521 http://ent.groundspring.org/EmailNow/pub.php?module=URLTracker&cmd=track&j=297764009&u=3308522 http://ent.groundspring.org/EmailNow/pub.php?module=URLTracker&cmd=track&j=297764009&u=3308523 http://ent.groundspring.org/EmailNow/pub.php?module=URLTracker&cmd=track&j=297764009&u=3308524 Recieve IVAW txt
IVAW Newsletter

Thank You From IVAW Send This Newsletter to a Friend




That's a message from Iraq Veterans Against the War on the Fort Hood shooting or shootings. Mary Pat Flaherty, William Wan and Christian Davenport (Washington Post) report that the suspect is US Army Maj Nidal M. Hasan, a 39-year-old psychiatrist whose aunt said he had endured mocking and verbal abuse over the years for being a Muslim and she states that he attempted to get out of the military. Peter Slevin (Washington Post) reports 12 people were killed at the base with thrity-one more left injured. Julian E. Barnes, Josh Meyer and Kat Linthicum (Los Angeles Times) explain, "Ft. Hood, which sprawls across 339 square miles of central Texas hill country, is the world's largest military installation. It supports two full armored divisions -- the 1st Cavalry Division and the 4th Infantry Division -- and is home to more than 70,000 soldiers, civilian workers and family members. It is the largest single employer in Texas." Ann Scott Tyson (Washington Post) notes, "This year, 117 active-duty Army soldiers were reported to have committed suicide, with 81 of those cases confirmed -- up from 103 suicides during the same period last year. Ten suicides have been reported at Fort Hood this year; more than 75 of its personnel have committed suicide since 2003. Fort Hood's high number of suicides is also linked to the fact that it is the Army's largest base, with more than 53,000 soldiers." Dahr Jamail adds:

Fort Hood, located in central Texas, is the largest US military base in the world and contains up to 50,000 soldiers. It is one of the most heavily deployed bases to both Iraq and Afghanistan. In fact, the shooter himself was facing an impending deployment to Iraq.
The soldier says that the mood on the base is “very grim,” and that even before this incident, troop morale has been very low.
"I'd say it's at an all-time low - mostly because of Afghanistan now," he explained. "Nobody knows why we are at either place, and I believe the troops need to know why they are there, or we should pull out, and this is a unanimous feeling, even for folks who are pro-war."
In a strikingly similar incident on May 11, 2009, a US soldier gunned down five fellow soldiers at a stress-counseling center at a US base in Baghdad. Adm. Mike Mullen, the chairman of the US military’s Joint Chiefs of Staff, told reporters at a news conference at the Pentagon that the shootings occurred in a place where “individuals were seeking help.”
"It does speak to me, though, about the need for us to redouble our efforts, the concern in terms of dealing with the stress," Admiral Mullen said. "It also speaks to the issue of multiple deployments."
Commenting on that incident in nearly parallel terms, US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates said that the Pentagon needs to redouble its efforts to relieve stress caused by repeated deployments in war zones; stress that is further exacerbated by limited time at home in between deployments.

Think about something, this took place on a base. There are rumors that the alleged shooter not only wanted out of the military but was set to deploy to Afghanistan. And we had a subcommittee of the US House Armed Services Committee meet this morning for a hearing entitled Iraq and Afghanistan: Perspectives on US Strategy, Part II in which Iraq was pretty much ignored -- two witnesses mentioned it in their opening statements (with something more than a shout-out or a 'old news' pose). Like it was during Part I.

Exactly how the hell does that happen?

Perspectives on US Strategy took place with an emphasis on political and civilian in Afghanistan but even though Iraq still can't pass an election law, Iraq wasn't a topic.

If the Congress works that damn hard to forget and ignore Iraq, it's a bit futile to keep hurling stones at the media for their own silences.

As noted in the snapshot today, a Colorado Rep tried to grand stand on the corpses of service members killed in Afghanistan while apparently so stupid he wasn't even aware that the Pentagon announced a Colorado native had died in Iraq just days ago.

How does the Armed Service Committee get away with ignoring Iraq? That's twice now. And the chair, by the way, is Vic Synder. So maybe we should put the question to him? Does he not know that the Iraq War hasn't ended? Does he not feel that oversight of it falls to his oversight subcommittee?

I have no idea but I know it's getting damn insulting. And when an incident like today happens? It just underscores how little work's being done on the Hill -- and don't get me started on the we-never-meet Senate Veterans Committee.

It's over, I'm done writing songs about love
There's a war going on
So I'm holding my gun with a strap and a glove
And I'm writing a song about war
And it goes
Na na na na na na na
I hate the war
Na na na na na na na
I hate the war
Na na na na na na na
I hate the war
Oh oh oh oh
-- "I Hate The War" (written by Greg Goldberg, on The Ballet's Mattachine!)

Last Thursday, ICCC's number of US troops killed in Iraq since the start of the illegal war was 4353. Tonight? 4359. Do you get that? Do you get that since last Thursday, that number's increased by six and yet a House Armed Services subcommittee couldn't make time for Iraq today.


The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com.